blog/content/post/2005/11/09/2005-11-09-ideas-for-startu...

1.6 KiB
Raw Blame History

title author date url wordtwit_post_info categories
”Ideas for Startups”を読んで気になった部分 — 04 kazu634 2005-11-09 /2005/11/09/_187/
O:8:"stdClass":13:{s:6:"manual";b:0;s:11:"tweet_times";i:1;s:5:"delay";i:0;s:7:"enabled";i:1;s:10:"separation";s:2:"60";s:7:"version";s:3:"3.7";s:14:"tweet_template";b:0;s:6:"status";i:2;s:6:"result";a:0:{}s:13:"tweet_counter";i:2;s:13:"tweet_log_ids";a:1:{i:0;i:2179;}s:9:"hash_tags";a:0:{}s:8:"accounts";a:1:{i:0;s:7:"kazu634";}}
つれづれ

Paul Grahm: “The Ideas for Startups”を読んで気になった部分にコメントしようと思いましたが、眠いので今日は原文だけを紹介しておきます。

If new ideas arise like doodles, this would explain why you have to work at something for a while before you have any. Its not just that you cant judge ideas till youre an expert in a field. You wont even generate ideas, because you wont have any habits of mind to invoke.

Of course the habits of mind you invoke on some field dont have to be derived from working in that field. In fact, its often better if theyre not. Youre not just looking for good ideas, but for good new ideas, and you have a better chance of generating those if you combine stuff from distant fields.